People v. $5,608 United States Currency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming arguendo that detective was agent of State, he was not thereby excluded from testifying against decedent pursuant to Dead-Man's Act (citing Gieseke v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 61 Ill. App. 3d 119, 124-25 (1965
• an interested person is one who will directly experience a monetary gain or loss as an immediate result of the judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).