People v. 1515 COOLIDGE AVE., AURORA, ILL.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the claimant failed to satisfy section 8(D) and, consequently, the property was subject to forfeiture, where the claimant held the real estate for the benefit of another, who purchased it with proceeds from drug dealing
• noting that this burden differs from the federal forfeiture statute, under which the government must show that probable cause existed when forfeiture action was instituted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).