People of Michigan v. Mohamed Nadir Boukhatmi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the mere favorable treatment of one younger manager as compared to one older manager may not be sufficient to infer age discrimination”
• acknowledging that disparate treatment from that received by substantially younger, similarly situated workers states a claim under the ADEA
• holding that a Title VII plaintiff “[cannot] pick and choose a person she perceives is a valid comparator who was allegedly treated more favorably, and completely ignore a significant group of comparators who were treated equally or less favorably than she”
• explaining that a comparator should show that a similarly situated nonmember of a protected class was treated more favorably than a member of the protected class
• explaining that courts use the same framework to assess Title VII and PHRA claims
• explaining that courts use the same framework to assess Title VII and PHRA claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).