Skip to main content
· 6/2/2017

People of Michigan v. Latonya Renae Hobson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “general instruction” “given only after closing arguments had been completed” telling the jury that arguments and statements by lawyers are not evidence did not remedy the statement’s prejudicial effect
  • vacating a conviction “because of numerous errors relating to the prosecutor’s misconduct at trial that, considered cumulatively, deprived [the defendants] of a fair proceeding.”
  • noting that \comments on credibility not coupled with a more detailed analysis of the evidence convey an impression to the jury that they should simply trust the State's judgment that a witness is or is not credible\ (alteration omitted) (quotation marks omitted)
  • noting that “comments on credibility not coupled with a more detailed analysis of the evidence convey an impression to the jury that they should simply trust the State’s judgment that a witness is or is not credible” (alteration omitted) (quotation marks omitted)
  • finding a prosecutor engaged in misconduct by questioning a witness about religious prayers and the Ten Commandments
  • Prosecutorial misconduct is not flagrant, and therefore does not mandate reversal, when the misconduct is “outweighed by the strength of the government’s evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.