People of Michigan v. James Ross Winrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[w]here the property alleged to have been converted is money, ‘it must be specifically identifiable and be subject to an obligation to be returned or to be otherwise treated in a particular manner’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).