People of Michigan v. Derrick Clayton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that reasonable expectation of success and motivation to combine are \two different legal concepts\
• explaining that reasonable expectation of success and motivation to combine are “two different legal concepts”
• explaining that “one must have a motivation to combine accompanied by a reasonable expectation” of success (emphasis added)
• explaining that review for substantial evidence “requires examination of the record as a whole, taking into account evidence that both justifies and detracts from an agency’s decision”
• holding a reply brief and declaration exceeded the proper scope for a reply because they cited “a number of non-patent litera- ture references which were not relied upon to support un- patentability in the Petition”
• citing, inter alia, Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 688 F.3d 1342, 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).