People of Michigan v. Cory William Nelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the 150-day rule is applicable to a foreign resident who is in the United States when the notice is mailed, but outside the United States when the notice is delivered
• holding that the 150-day rule is applicable to a foreign resident who is in the United States when the notice is mailed, but outside the United States when the notice is delivered
• holding that the 150-day rule is applicable to a foreign resident who is in the United States when the notice is mailed, but outside the United States when the notice is delivered
• stating that Estate of Krueger broadened the Court's holding in Hamilton and \expanded the class of persons entitled to file within 150 days\
• stating that “ephemeral presence at the moment the deficiency notice is mailed is not controlling”
• stating that Estate of Krueger broadened the Court’s holding in Hamilton and “expanded the class of persons entitled to file within 150 days”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).