Skip to main content
· 3/28/2018

People of Michigan v. Christopher Michael McGee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • close scrutiny given to facts where sole shareholders in complete control of company seek to claim deduction for “compensation” when earnings were distributed as dividends; denying deduction on facts of case
  • “It is now settled law that only if payment is made with the intent to compensate is it deductible as compensation. Whether such intent has been demonstrated is a factual question to be decided on the basis of the particular facts and circumstances of the case.” (internal citations omitted
  • payments made in the form of distributions
  • proper intent necessary for compensation deduction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.