Skip to main content
· 7/26/2016

People of Michigan v. Arthur B Jones Jr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding Graham was entitled to expungement because PFA records in cases initiated by Graham’s paramour contained bald, unproven allegations of abuse, as only temporary PFA orders were entered against Graham and the orders were dismissed before a hearing was held
  • appellant entitled to expungement as a matter of law where only temporary PFA orders were entered against him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.