Skip to main content
· 8/8/1996

People in the Interest of CLS

Citations

  • 934 P.2d 851
  • 20 Brief Times Rptr. 1379
  • 1996 Colo. App. LEXIS 232
  • 1996 WL 445134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[F]ollowing an adjudication of dependency and neglect, the initial dispositional order adopting a treatment plan constitutes a ‘decree of disposition’ and renders the adjudication and the initial dispositional order final for purposes of appeal.”
  • the specific ground on which a child is found to be dependent and neglected does “not restrict the juvenile court’s discretion to formulate a treatment plan in the best interests of the child”
  • “The adjudication of whether a child is dependent and neglected involves a hearing distinct from, and is for a purpose different than, the determination of a proper disposition of a child so adjudicated.”
  • “[T]he specific ground on which the [court finds] the child to be dependent and neglected [does] not restrict the juvenile court’s discretion to formulate a treatment plan in the best interests of the child.”
  • “[T]he specific ground on which the jury [finds] the child to be dependent and neglected [does] not restrict the juvenile court’s discretion to formulate a treatment plan in the best interests of the child.”
  • “[T]he specific ground on which the jury [finds] the child to be dependent and neglected [does] not restrict the juvenile court’s discretion to formulate a treatment plan in the best interests of the child.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briggs, Davidson, Taubman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.