Skip to main content
· 10/28/1991

People in Interest of AM v. HERLINDA M.

Citations

  • 583 N.E.2d 36
  • 221 Ill. App. 3d 957
  • 164 Ill. Dec. 482
  • 1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 1841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that fee request made pursuant to the Juvenile Court Act was “outside the issues involved in the principal action”
  • the purpose of Supreme Court Rule 304 is to prevent piecemeal appeals
  • the purpose of Supreme Court Rule 304 is to prevent piecemeal appeals
  • “fee requests are generally collateral or -4- incidental to the principal action”
  • the purpose of Supreme Court Rule 304 is to prevent piecemeal appeals
  • \fee requests are generally collateral or incidental to the principal action\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.