People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that bare assertions of pattern or practice in complaint were insufficient
• noting that orders of “less than two years’ duration ordinarily evade review.”
• concluding challenge was moot where plaintiff failed to move for preliminary relief
• “[M]ootness of claim against a specific agency action also moots claims for declaratory relief over those specific agency 2 actions.”
• “[tjhat mootness of a claim against a specific agency action also moots claims for declaratory relief over those specific agency actions is well-attested in D.C. Circuit precedent”
• “That mootness of a claim against a specific agency action also moots claims for declaratory relief over those specific agency actions is well-attested in D.C. Circuit precedent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).