People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Doughney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Defendant clearly intended to confuse, mislead and divert internet users into accessing his web site which contained information antithetical and therefore harmful to the goodwill represented by the PETA mark.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).