People ex rel. Wysocki v. Webster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the nexus between a coach’s defamation action and a former student’s pursuit of a college degree in new York was insufficient to support jurisdiction
• defendant must have been involved in “purposeful activities” in New York which were “substantial[fy] relat[ed]” to the suit
• no substantial relationship between defendant daughter’s attendance at a New York university and subsequent allegedly defamatory comments about university coach by defendant daughter and letters written on same subject by defendant father
• defamation action based on letters sent by California residents about incident occurring at New York school did not arise out of defendants’ transactions in New York, namely defendants’ daughter’s attendance at the New York school
• “While appellants urge that jurisdiction may constitutionally be premised on broader standards articulated by the United States Supreme Court, the New York long-arm statute does not provide for in personam jurisdiction in every case in which due process would permit it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).