Skip to main content
· 12/2/1892

People ex rel. Wilshire v. Newman

Citations

  • 96 Cal. 605
  • 31 P. 564
  • 1892 Cal. LEXIS 994

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[o]ne reason why a new trial is demanded, where there is no doubt as to the disqualification of the juror (and where such disqualification is not waived by knowledge of the fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.