People ex rel. Williams v. Wabash Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no 8 error in the consideration of facts occurring before previous custody order because the evidence was considered “in the context of its continuing effect on the Children” (emphasis in original)
• third party was not required to prove Hendrickson factors to carry its burden

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).