Skip to main content
· 2/22/1922

People ex rel. Watseka Telephone Co. v. Emmerson

Citations

  • 302 Ill. 300
  • 134 N.E. 707

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Our supreme court has repeatedly held that while the dismissal and refiling of the same charges does not reset the one-year period, it does toll the clock for the actual days between dismissal and refiling (or arrest).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.