Skip to main content
· 5/15/1923

People ex rel. Tulp v. McCann

Citations

  • 206 A.D. 700

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court finding as to whether 5 and how the prospective juror's views on capital punishment would affect his performance not entitled to 6 deference where the evidence otherwise is so opposed to the trial court’s decision that the question 7 becomes one of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.