People ex rel. Thompson v. Walleck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• decision was supported by substantial evidence that “there would be no injury to the public health and general welfare of the area” because the use would protect “the aesthetic value . . . of the area”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).