People ex rel. Stephens v. Holten

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• An attorney’s lien for fees must be based upon some contract with the client in order to subject the results of an action to a lien.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hamer v. Kirk
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-10-01· cited 86×
• Ashman v. Schecter
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-02· cited 25×
• Von Holt v. Izumo Taisha Kyo Mission
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1960-03-25· cited 18×
• Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor
  D.C. Circuit· 1991-08-09· cited 10×
• Dennis v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-02-16· cited 10×
• Glenn Armentor Law Corp. v. Counts
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1994-09-16· cited 8×
• Flynn v. Kucharski
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-12-19· cited 6×
• In Re Application of Wellhofer
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1951-09-28· cited 2×
• People ex rel. Moriarty v. Rutter
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-01-07· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Holten
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1919-02-20· cited 22×
• People v. Parker
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1907-12-17· cited 16×
• Thomas v. Board of Trustees
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1874-01-15· cited 15×
• Hendrick v. Posey
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1898-04-23· cited 5×
• George Green Lumber Co. v. Nutriment Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1906-12-22· cited 1×