Colorado Court of Appeals· 6/25/2009
People ex rel. S.G.L.
Citations
- 214 P.3d 580
- 2009 Colo. App. LEXIS 1180
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that witness credibility is a matter for the factfinder
- “[W]e draw every inference fairly deducible from the evidence in favor of the court’s decision.”
- “The 21 purpose of an adjudicatory hearing is to determine whether . . . the status of the subject child or children warrants intrusive protective or corrective state intervention into the familial relationship.”
- “In determining whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain an adjudication, . . . we draw every inference fairly deducible from the evidence in favor of the court's decision.”
- “The credibility of the witnesses and the sufficiency, probative effect, and weight of the evidence, as well as the inferences and concl usions to be drawn therefrom, are within the discretion of the [fact finder ].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gabriel, Roy, Taubman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People ex rel. N.G.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2012-08-02· cited 1,229×
- People Ex Rel. G.E.S.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2016-12-15· cited 533×
- People ex rel. S.X.M.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2011-09-15· cited 261×
- In re S.M-LColorado Court of Appeals· 2016-11-17· cited 175×
- Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2011-01-18· cited 49×
- People ex rel. S.N. v. S.N.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2014-06-30· cited 48×
- People v. M.L.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2016-05-23· cited 17×
- People in the Interest of J.GSupreme Court of Colorado· 2016-05-23· cited 16×
- People ex rel. A.H.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2011-05-26· cited 9×
- Berumen v. Department of Human Services, Wheat Ridge Regional CenterColorado Court of Appeals· 2012-04-26· cited 8×
- People ex rel. J.G.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2014-12-31· cited 7×
- Clark v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals· 2009-11-12· cited 6×
- People in re L.KColorado Court of Appeals· 2016-07-14· cited 4×
- People ex rel. L.L.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2017-03-23· cited 4×
- People In the Interest of S.T., a Child, and Concerning Q.WColorado Court of Appeals· 2015-10-08· cited 2×
- People Ex Rel. SxmColorado Court of Appeals· 2011-09-15
- People Ex Rel. LbColorado Court of Appeals· 2011-04-28
- People Ex Rel. SglColorado Court of Appeals· 2009-06-25
- People in the Interest of S.T., and Concerning Q.WColorado Court of Appeals· 2015-10-08
- People v. Miranda Christine MossColorado Court of Appeals· 2022-08-11
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People in Interest of DLRSupreme Court of Colorado· 1981-11-30· cited 198×
- State Ex Rel. Udall v. Colonial Penn InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-05-08· cited 60×
- People ex rel. D.R.W.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2004-03-11· cited 39×
- Holter v. Moore and Co.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1983-12-08· cited 26×
- Daugaard v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1971-09-27· cited 18×
- Silver Engineering Works, Inc. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Colorado· 1973-01-15· cited 17×
- People in Interest of AMDSupreme Court of Colorado· 1982-07-19· cited 10×
- In Re the Estate of DamonHawaii Supreme Court· 2006-02-28· cited 6×
- People Ex Rel. TdColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-03-09· cited 3×
- People Ex Rel. TlbColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-10-19· cited 1×
Other cases named People ex rel. S.G.L.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.