· 10/3/2002
People Ex Rel. Ryan v. Roe
Citations
- 778 N.E.2d 701
- 201 Ill. 2d 552
- 268 Ill. Dec. 435
- 2002 Ill. LEXIS 937
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a sentence agreed to by the parties and imposed by the trial court is void when in violation of a statute
- holding that estoppel did not apply in a negotiated plea where the sentence agreed to by the parties and imposed by the court was in violation of statutory requirement; amended the sentencing order to appropriately reduce the defendant’s sentence
- holding that estoppel did not apply in a negotiated plea where the sentence agreed to by the parties and imposed by the court was in violation of statutory requirement; amended the sentencing order to appropriately reduce the defendant's sentence
- supreme court exercised its discretion and fashioned an appropriate remedy where a guilty plea had been induced by a legally unfulfillable promise
- supreme court exercised its discretion and fashioned an appropriate remedy where a guilty plea had been induced by a legally unfulfillable promise
- “[T]he trial court had no authority to order, and the State had no authority to agree, that the defendant’s eight-year sentence was not subject to truth-in-sentencing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fitzgerald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.