Skip to main content
· 10/3/2002

People Ex Rel. Ryan v. Roe

Citations

  • 778 N.E.2d 701
  • 201 Ill. 2d 552
  • 268 Ill. Dec. 435
  • 2002 Ill. LEXIS 937

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a sentence agreed to by the parties and imposed by the trial court is void when in violation of a statute
  • holding that estoppel did not apply in a negotiated plea where the sentence agreed to by the parties and imposed by the court was in violation of statutory requirement; amended the sentencing order to appropriately reduce the defendant’s sentence
  • holding that estoppel did not apply in a negotiated plea where the sentence agreed to by the parties and imposed by the court was in violation of statutory requirement; amended the sentencing order to appropriately reduce the defendant's sentence
  • supreme court exercised its discretion and fashioned an appropriate remedy where a guilty plea had been induced by a legally unfulfillable promise
  • supreme court exercised its discretion and fashioned an appropriate remedy where a guilty plea had been induced by a legally unfulfillable promise
  • “[T]he trial court had no authority to order, and the State had no authority to agree, that the defendant’s eight-year sentence was not subject to truth-in-sentencing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.