People ex rel. Pilgrim v. Scully

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the Supreme Court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendant because a “mobile clothes rack . . . was not an inherently dangerous condition”
• affirming summary judgment for defendant in case involving \readily observable\ clothing rack
• affirming summary judgment for defendant in case involving “readily observable” clothing rack
• defendant store not liable to plaintiff who “fell when her foot got caught on the bottom rail of a mobile clothes rack located in an aisle in the defendant’s department store” because the “rack was readily observable by the reasonable use of one’s senses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).