· 12/15/2003
People Ex Rel. Orloff v. Pacific Bell
Citations
- 80 P.3d 201
- 7 Cal. Rptr. 3d 315
- 31 Cal. 4th 1132
- 2003 Daily Journal DAR 13601
- 2003 Cal. LEXIS 9459
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering claims against communications utilities by county district attorneys for violations of the California Business and Professions Code
- “Indeed, the PUC itself, in an amicus curiae brief ... agrees that nothing in the present action undermines or hinders any ongoing policy, program, or other aspect of its authority.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: George
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.