People ex rel. Mugavero v. Vento

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, even if a police officer made a discretionary decision to undertake an investigation, the officer’s subsequent negligent acts in performing the investigation were not protected by discretionary immunity
• finding that a police officer investigating an auto collision in which the plaintiff was involved had a duty of reasonable care when the police officer asked the plaintiff to come to the middle of the intersection and another car hit the plaintiff
• denying defendants’ motion to dismiss 7 when county employees through acts and omissions caused plaintiff to be wrongfully 8 arrested on multiple occasions
• § 820.2 24 immunity does not apply to officer’s negligent conduct of traffic investigation, once undertaken

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).