People ex rel. Mosco v. Vigil

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “federal interest is significantly diminished where, as here, the state exercises jurisdiction over a person who is not a member of the tribe”
• noting that “a state may exercise jurisdiction on a tribal reservation absent express federal consent if the operation of federal law does not preempt it from doing so”
• noting that “a state may exercise jurisdiction on a tribal reservation absent express federal consent if the operation of federal law does not preempt it from doing so”
• stating that “the goals of tribal self-government, self- sufficiency, and economic development are overriding goals,” and they “reflect an interest in protecting a tribe’s retained sovereignty over its members and its territory” (citations omitted)
• finding a diminished federal interest when an Indian engaged in conduct on a reservation of a tribe of which he was not a member
• discussing the extent to which the state can exercise jurisdiction on a tribal reservation absent express federal consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).