People ex rel. Morgan v. Hayne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where “statutory language is clear and does not lead to an unreasonable or absurd result, it is the sole evidence of the ultimate legislative intent” (cleaned up)
• “[A] court of law is not authorized to rewrite the statute by inserting additional language” (quoting Abdulkadir v. State, 610 S.E.2d 50, 53 (Ga. 2005))
• “This Court . . . is not in the business of rewriting unambiguous statutory authority.”
• “This Court . . . is not in the business of rewriting unambiguous statutory authority.”
• \[A] court of law is not authorized to rewrite the statute by inserting additional language\ (quoting Abdulkadir v. State , 279 Ga. 122 , 610 S.E.2d 50 , 53 (2005) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).