People ex rel. Lotze v. Annucci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that legislative history makes clear that \States have power to determine who is 'needy' \
• noting that legislative history makes clear that “States have power to determine who is ‘needy’ ”
• striking down regulation that terminated AFDC payments to children whose mothers cohabitated with men other than the children’s fathers
• relying on “[t]he pattern of this legislation,” and “[t]he underlying policy and consistency in statutory interpretation”
• striking down Alabama regulation that denied AFDC benefits to children of mother who “cohabits” with man to whom, she is unmarried as invalid under Social Security Act
• striking down a state regulation which denied benefits to the dependent children of a woman cohabiting with a man, regardless of whether the man in fact contributed to the support of the children

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).