People ex rel. Lenefsky v. Ashworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a meeting of the minds requires “manifestation of mutual assent sufficiently definite to assure that the parties are truly in agreement with respect to all material terms”
• requiring an “objective meeting of the minds” before finding a binding and enforceable contract
• “The inquiry is twofold: do 5 the blanks in the [agreement] render those terms impenetrably vague and uncertain, and 6 are the terms themselves material?”
• “To create a binding contract, there must be a manifestation of mutual assent sufficiently definite to assure that the parties are truly in agreement with respect to' all material terms.” (citation omitted)
• to create a binding contract, there must be a manifestation of mutual assent sufficiently definite to assure that the parties are truly in agreement with respect to all material terms
• “To create a binding contract, there must be a manifestation of mutual assent sufficiently definite to assure that the parties are truly in agreement with respect to all material terms.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).