People Ex Rel. K.L-P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an issue not raised in a petition for district court review may not be raised for the first time on appeal
• concluding that the appellant was required to raise arguments concerning the magistrate’s denial of a motion to continue in the petition for review of the magistrate’s final judgment
• holding that a party appealing a magistrate’s decision must raise the particular issue in the district court, thereby allowing the district court to correct any error, before raising the issue on appeal
• noting that a party must raise an issue in the juvenile court so that the court has an opportunity to correct any error that the magistrate may have made
• noting that, if the court of appeals serves as a second layer of appellate review, a party must raise the issue in the district court to preserve it for review in the court of appeals
• noting that, because a petition for review of a magistrate’s ruling is a prerequisite to an appeal, a party is required to present an issue in a petition for review before we may consider it on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).