People ex rel. Kirchner v. Loomis
Citations
- 94 Ill. 587
Syllabus
<p>Mandamus—practice in the Supreme Court. A motion was made in this court for an order to show cause why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not issue to compel a county judge to sign a bill of exceptions. The motion was based merely upon an affidavit of one of the attorneys in the case, and the bill of exceptions which the judge had refused to sign. The motion was denied upon the ground that, according to the practice in this court, a petition should have been presented showing the grounds of the application. Such a writ can not be awarded upon mere motion.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an oral agreement regarding maintenance of a fence entered between original parties was not a covenant running with the land that bound subsequent grantee
- holding that an oral agreement regarding maintenance of a fence entered between original parties was not a covenant running with the land that bound subsequent grantee
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Craig
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.