Skip to main content
· 6/26/2014

People ex rel. Jackson v. Canty

Citations

  • 23 N.Y.3d 1009

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “it is foolhardy to suggest that every prejudicial error is cured by any curative instruction of some sort . . . in spite of anything which may be said by the judges, some evidence will be so inherently harmful that the jury will draw conclusions from it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.