Skip to main content
· 12/31/1897

People ex rel. Hyde v. Sheffield

Citations

  • 48 N.Y.S. 1112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff was precluded from filing separate suits for injuries to his dog and for his dog's death arising out the same attack by the defendant's dog

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.