People ex rel. Hunt v. Kalamazoo Circuit Judge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even though men were also offended by daily stream of sexual and sexist antics, jury could reasonably find that female plaintiff was individual target of harassment
• holding that a reasonable juiy could conclude that an incident involving a “vulgar song and picture, and [] graphic descriptions of sexual activity (espedially oral sex
• noting that an employer is only liable if it “knew or should have known about the harassment and failed to stop it”
• inferring discrimination in part because no male employee was subjected to same conduct as female plaintiff
• finding sex-based harassment where plaintiff’s male coworkers maintained conversation around her where they portrayed women as being sexually subordinate to men
• knowledge of harassment can be imputed to an employer if a reasonable person, intent on complying with Title VII, would have known about the harassment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).