Skip to main content
· 6/15/1934

People Ex Rel. Huff v. Palmer

Citations

  • 191 N.E. 199
  • 356 Ill. 563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • any doubt as to whether a witness could sufficiently identify the defendant as the voice heard during a telephone call after hearing his voice on only one occasion four months after the telephone call went to the weight of the evidence rather than to its admissibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.