· 6/15/1934
People Ex Rel. Huff v. Palmer
Citations
- 191 N.E. 199
- 356 Ill. 563
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- any doubt as to whether a witness could sufficiently identify the defendant as the voice heard during a telephone call after hearing his voice on only one occasion four months after the telephone call went to the weight of the evidence rather than to its admissibility
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.