People ex rel. Hudson v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the improper admission of the defendant’s driving record was not fundamental error, in part, because it was the only evidence relating to the defendant’s character
• holding that defendant’s failure to request continuance waived any appellate claim regarding the trial court’s ruling permitting State to amend the charging information the day before trial
• providing that the failure to raise an objection or challenge an issue at trial results in waiver of the issue on appeal
• explaining that “a defendant’s failure to request a continuance after a trial court allows a pre-trial substantive amendment to the charging information over defendant’s objection results in waiver”
• “The failure to raise an issue at trial waives the issue on appeal.”
• “The failure to raise an issue at trial waives the issue on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).