· 3/29/1988
People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Unimax, Inc.
Citations
- 523 N.E.2d 26
- 168 Ill. App. 3d 718
- 119 Ill. Dec. 558
- 1988 Ill. App. LEXIS 375
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a marketing scheme whereby the marketer obtained commissions dependent upon bringing others into the system fell within the definition of a prohibited “pyramid sales scheme” under the Consumer Fraud Act
- holding that a marketing scheme whereby the marketer obtained commissions dependent upon bringing others into the system fell within the definition of a prohibited \pyramid sales scheme\ under the Consumer Fraud Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hartman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.