Skip to main content
· 3/29/1988

People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Unimax, Inc.

Citations

  • 523 N.E.2d 26
  • 168 Ill. App. 3d 718
  • 119 Ill. Dec. 558
  • 1988 Ill. App. LEXIS 375

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a marketing scheme whereby the marketer obtained commissions dependent upon bringing others into the system fell within the definition of a prohibited “pyramid sales scheme” under the Consumer Fraud Act
  • holding that a marketing scheme whereby the marketer obtained commissions dependent upon bringing others into the system fell within the definition of a prohibited \pyramid sales scheme\ under the Consumer Fraud Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.