People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Knecht Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining high prices alone are generally insufficient to establish unfairness under the Consumer Fraud Act, a party must also show the practice violates public policy, is immoral, unethical, or oppressive, and harms consumers
• explaining high prices alone are generally insufficient to establish unfairness under the Consumer Fraud Act, a party must also show the practice violates public policy, is immoral, unethical, or oppressive, and harms consumers
• explaining high prices alone are generally insufficient to establish unfairness under the Consumer Fraud Act, a party must also show the practice violates public policy, is immoral, unethical, or oppressive, and harms consumers
• business that was in superior bargaining position committed unfair practice by using superior position and intimidation to charge and attempt to collect excessively high prices
• “Because plaintiff simply requests the affirmance of the trial court’s judgment on counts V and VI of the complaint, no cross-appeal was necessary.”
• “the Illinois legislature has specifically stated that, in construing section 2 of the [ICFA], consideration shall be given to the interpretations of the Federal Trade Commission and the federal courts relating to Section 5(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).