Skip to main content
· 10/15/1870

People ex rel. Hamilton v. Washington

Citations

  • 40 Cal. 173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding trial court’s finding that “the testimony of the arresting officers showed they had a search warrant refutes the evidence of the [defendant] that there was none”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Expressed, Speague, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.