· 10/15/1870
People ex rel. Hamilton v. Washington
Citations
- 40 Cal. 173
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding trial court’s finding that “the testimony of the arresting officers showed they had a search warrant refutes the evidence of the [defendant] that there was none”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Expressed, Speague, Wallace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.