Skip to main content
· 12/17/1915

People ex rel. Haight v. Brown

Citations

  • 216 N.Y. 743

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that because appellant applied for extension of time to file transcript after the initial filing period expired, trial court's grant of the motion was \nugatory and void\
  • concluding that because appellant applied for extension of time to file transcript after the initial filing period expired, trial court’s grant of the motion was “nugatory and void”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.