Skip to main content
· 7/15/1988

People Ex Rel. Foreman v. Village of Round Lake Park

Citations

  • 525 N.E.2d 868
  • 171 Ill. App. 3d 443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding contract was not severable because the unenforceable clause was an “essential feature” of the agreement.
  • “Courts which will enforce a contract with a portion severed generally do so when the severed portion does not go to the contract’s essence.”
  • trial court’s allowance of amendment to include statute of limitations defense did not prejudice opposing party because, though motion for summary judgment was pending, trial had not begun
  • “Courts which will enforce a contract with a portion severed generally do so when the severed portion does not go to the contract’s essence.”
  • because relevant dates remained uncontested, and thus, newly-amended statute of limitations defense did not require either party to conduct further investigation, opposing party did not suffer prejudice
  • trial court's allowance of amendment to include statute of limitations defense did not prejudice opposing party because, though motion for summary judgment was pending, trial had not begun

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.