· 7/15/1988
People Ex Rel. Foreman v. Village of Round Lake Park
Citations
- 525 N.E.2d 868
- 171 Ill. App. 3d 443
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding contract was not severable because the unenforceable clause was an “essential feature” of the agreement.
- “Courts which will enforce a contract with a portion severed generally do so when the severed portion does not go to the contract’s essence.”
- trial court’s allowance of amendment to include statute of limitations defense did not prejudice opposing party because, though motion for summary judgment was pending, trial had not begun
- “Courts which will enforce a contract with a portion severed generally do so when the severed portion does not go to the contract’s essence.”
- because relevant dates remained uncontested, and thus, newly-amended statute of limitations defense did not require either party to conduct further investigation, opposing party did not suffer prejudice
- trial court's allowance of amendment to include statute of limitations defense did not prejudice opposing party because, though motion for summary judgment was pending, trial had not begun
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dunn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.