People Ex Rel. Foreman v. Nash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to address the merits because the questions presented are not important to the administration of justice
• refusing to address the merits because the questions presented are not important to the administration of justice
• first examining whether writs of mandamus or prohibition or supervisory orders would constitute appropriate remedies in that case
• first examining whether writs of mandamus or prohibition or supervisory orders would constitute appropriate remedies in that case
• “[W]e do not consider that the questions as presented here are of such importance to the administration of justice that they necessitate this court’s exercise of its supervisory authority.”
• where the issue presented is sufficiently important to the administration of justice, this court may issue a writ of prohibition even if all of the aforementioned requirements are not met

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).