People ex rel. Ditchik v. Sheriff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• both comprehensive scope of Plan and several of its specific provisions implied state legislature’s intent to abrogate insurer’s common-law right to rescind policy on ground of fraud or misrepresentation
• “Manifestly, nothing would be gained by compelling insurance carriers to issue insurance to individuals otherwise unable to obtain a policy if the conditions under which the insurance could be cancelled or avoided were not also the subject of regulation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).