People Ex Rel. Dickey v. Southern Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• for an act to repeal an earlier one by implication, there must be “such total and manifest repugnance that the two cannot stand together”
• for an act to repeal an earlier one by implication, there must be “such total and manifest repugnance that the two cannot stand together”
• “if the two enactments are capable of being construed so that both may stand, it is the duty of this court to so construe them”
• “[f]or a later enactment to operate as a repeal by implication of an earlier one there must be such total and manifest repugnance that the two cannot stand together”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).