People ex rel. de la Torre Bueno v. McLaughlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on dictionary to determine “common definition” of terms in a rider
• relying on dictionary to determine “common definition” of terms in a rider
• “[P]arties cannot create ambiguity from whole cloth where none exists, because provisions ‘are not ambiguous merely because the parties interpret them differently.’”
• “parties cannot create ambiguity from whole cloth where none exists, because provisions are not ambiguous merely because the parties interpret them differently”
• “[P]arties cannot create ambiguity from whole cloth where none exists, because provisions are not ambiguous merely because the parties interpret them differently.”
• “[P]arties cannot create ambiguity from whole cloth where none exists, because provisions are not ambiguous merely because the parties interpret them differently”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).