People ex rel. Copland v. Directors of Minong Mining Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding multiple reasonable interpretations of remarks made by the inventor in patent prosecution so disavowal did not occur
• “[T]he district court’s claim construction inevitably required the invalidation of claims 33 and 41 [for indefiniteness], in contradiction to the canon that courts should attempt to construe claims to pre- serve their validity.”
• “[T]he district court’s claim construction inevitably required the invalidation of claims 33 and 41 [for indefiniteness], in contradiction to the canon that courts should attempt to construe claims to pre- serve their validity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).