Skip to main content
· 2/21/1923

People ex rel. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Kowalski

Citations

  • 307 Ill. 378
  • 138 N.E. 634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “what matters for the purpose of the burglary statute is how the defendant entered the property, not how he exited the property” (emphasis in original)
  • observing that Gray involved entry into “a completely enclosed area”
  • refusing to apply the statute to area only partially enclosed by a fence
  • observ‐ ing that Gray involved entry into “a completely enclosed ar‐ ea”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cartwright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.