Skip to main content
· 12/1/1980

People Ex Rel. Carey v. Chrastka

Citations

  • 413 N.E.2d 1269
  • 83 Ill. 2d 67
  • 46 Ill. Dec. 156
  • 1980 Ill. LEXIS 482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing Habitual Juvenile Offender Act (Ill. Rev. Stat., 1979 Supp., ch. 37, par. 705—12) for ex post facto violations
  • The right to trial by jury is not, as a general proposition, constitutionally required in juvenile proceedings
  • the right to trial by jury is not, as a general proposition, constitutionally required in juvenile proceedings
  • The right to trial by jury is not, as a general proposition, constitutionally required in juvenile proceedings
  • analyzing Habitual Juvenile Offender Act for ex post facto violations
  • analyzing Habitual Juvenile Offender Act for ex post facto violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kluczynski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.