People Ex Rel. Burris v. Progressive Land Developers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that rejection of the arguments advanced by a party to a previous action “cannot be evidence of inadequate representation”
• recognizing that rejection of the arguments advanced by a party to a previous action “cannot be evidence of inadequate representation”
• finding that the action was barred by res judicata even though plaintiff listed different defendants in separate suits
• finding that the action was barred by res judicata even though plaintiff listed different defendants in separate suits
• finding that the action was barred by res judicata even though plaintiff listed different defendants in separate suits
• looking to the “extensiveness of the pleadings and the briefing” to determine whether a nonparty’s interest was adequately represented at the prior proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).