Skip to main content
· 12/23/1993

People Ex Rel. Burris v. Maraviglia

Citations

  • 636 N.E.2d 717
  • 264 Ill. App. 3d 392
  • 201 Ill. Dec. 285

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying private counsel’s motion to withdraw
  • upholding a trial court’s denial of an unpaid attorney’s motion to withdraw on the basis that granting the motion would be inequitable
  • “An appeal from a contempt order requires the reviewing court to examine the propriety of the underlying orders which ultimately resulted in the finding of contempt.”
  • attorney held in contempt for failing to file documents as ordered by the court
  • \An appeal from a contempt order requires the reviewing court to examine the propriety of the underlying orders which ultimately resulted in the finding of contempt.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Giannis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.